Threads of the Tapestry
Threads of the Tapestry Podcast
Do You See Me?
0:00
-3:48

Do You See Me?

On Remembering to Love Yourself First

“Do You See Me?” isn’t just a question for others—it’s a conversation about embodiment, spoken between the outer self and the soul within. The song is a call to choose truth, and to return to wholeness. Listen as a mirror to your own inner dialogue. The soul is always speaking. This is how we begin to listen deeply—to honor our presence, and to love ourselves.


✨💖✨ Do You See Me? ✨💖✨

On Remembering to Love Yourself First


There are moments when I find myself standing before the mirror—not searching for flaws or rehearsing everything I’ve been taught to fix—but in search of clarity, of the truth living within. There within lives a subtle resonance, older than language. It’s alive beneath the surface of roles, expectations, and strategies that we’ve all learned to gather so that we can move through the world.

I’m not looking for the self that performs competence, carries responsibility, or adapts smoothly to systems—she’s front and center all day, every day. I’m listening for the breath of self beneath that mirage—watching for a glimpse of the one who remembers, even when the world forgets.

Love is not a reward for conformity, capability, or performance. Love, in its truest form, begins with recognition of the self beneath survival, of the truth we carry, of our presence—and with recognition of our right to live in alignment with that truth.

Though, how could we possibly love ourselves if we don’t know ourselves fully? And if we don’t know ourselves, how can we expect others to love us in the ways we long to be loved?

Many of us know this feeling, even if we don’t always have words for it. It rises like a persistent ache. It’s the ache of sensing our own depth—a truth that longs to surface. This is the ache of wanting to live in honest relationship with who we are, rather than with who we’ve learned to be.

We move through structures that reward fragmentation—structures that prize speed, output, composure, and accommodation. These systems commodify worth and prioritize profit over well-being. In them, endurance masquerades as strength, and compliance passes for kindness, until survival replaces aliveness as the primary measure of success.

Yet our spirits are persistent. They continue to call for liberation. Something within us resists this narrowing. Something remembers that we are not alive merely to manage existence, but to inhabit it—fully, feelingly, with presence, agency, and voice.

Last night, I wrote a song called Do You See Me? At first, the question may seem directed outward, but truly it’s an inward inquiry—one I’ve been learning to sit with more honestly:

  • Do I see myself when I’m tired, or only when I’m productive?

  • Do I listen when something inside me says no, or do I override that signal to remain palatable and easy?

  • Do I allow my voice to exist, even when it shakes, or do I wait for certainty before I let it speak?

  • Do I offer myself the patience, tenderness, and curiosity that I extend so easily to others?

These are uncomfortable questions. They unsettle the places where we’ve disappeared from our own lives—asking us to notice where self-silencing became a default, where self-abandonment was mistaken for love, and where we were taught to treat our needs not as signals but as inconveniences.

This isn’t a personal failure—it’s a social inheritance.

Many women are raised with a social undercurrent, an often unspoken lesson that teaches us to bend before we learn how to stand. We’re praised and offered what looks like love for being accommodating, emotionally available, intuitive, self-sacrificing, and endlessly resilient. We’re taught—sometimes subtly, sometimes explicitly—that our goodness is measured by how much we can carry, how much we can absorb, and how little we require in return.

Yet, without presence—without agency and boundaries—care becomes performance, and capability becomes self-erasure. 🔥

In that dynamic, we enter a cycle of depletion—of self-abandonment. Care held without choice is not love; it becomes extraction. True care rooted in self-respect feels like a mutual rising, a choice to give freely from a full place. When care becomes coercive, manipulative, or obligatory, it’s no longer rooted in love at all.

This is why preserving self-agency matters. For many people, this can become almost paradoxical. While we are responsible for our own introspection and choices, we are also shaped by the systems around us. An inner battle between self and expectation tears at the seams of the presence we long to embody. Sometimes our very safety may feel threatened when we defy the expectations handed to us. Still, the soul calls—and we must answer.

bell hooks named this dynamic with luminous clarity. Patriarchy does not dominate solely through force, but through expectation—through the shaping of who gives and who receives, who is held responsible for emotional steadiness, and who is allowed to treat that steadiness as background infrastructure.

In this system, care stops being a freely chosen expression of love and becomes a debt. Emotional labor becomes invisible, and boundaries become suspect. When women begin to say no, the reaction is often confusion or resentment—because refusal disrupts an arrangement long dependent on our unspoken availability.

hooks didn’t argue against care—she argued for care rooted in choice, not obligation. She argued for love that is mutual, not mandatory and for support that honors the person offering it, rather than erasing them. Institutions often forget this, but those who lead with integrity can remember.

This distinction changes everything, because real love does not stem from or require self-erasure. It’s not endurance at any cost or silence mistaken for peace. It’s never the slow disappearance of one person so another can feel whole.

Love is alignment between presence and respect. It’s the capacity to remain in relationship even when honesty introduces complexity. It’s the courage to be seen and to see, not as curated ideals, but as living, shifting, sovereign selves.

Across traditions and cultures, love has always been plural—romantic love, friendship, communal love, creative love, familial love, devotional love, love of justice, self-love, and love of life itself. Modern culture flattens that spectrum, collapsing it into a single storyline that elevates romance, and even that devolves into spectacle, consumption, and performance.

We’re taught—often wordlessly—that being chosen is the highest form of validation but being chosen is not the same as being known. Desire is not understanding and pursuit is not presence.

Still, none of those outward forms replace the foundational relationship we have with ourselves. Before any relationship can feel nourishing rather than depleting, we must form an inner alignment that allows us to recognize what is true for us. This is not about perfection or constant clarity—it’s a practice of noticing, of honoring what feels expansive or constricting, and allowing our external life to reflect that inner truth.

This is what it means to become present, to become visible to ourselves. To love ourselves, we must know ourselves truly; not as a performance, brand, or curated identity—but as a living, embodied reflection of the soul within. To see ourselves fully is to say, I am here, and I am listening.

💖 From that place, love transforms. It becomes less about needing, longing, and earning—and more about recognizing. It becomes more about authenticity and honest wholeness that is met with clarity. ✨

🦋 Many of us long for deep connection. That’s not a flaw. Longing rooted in self-recognition feels different than longing rooted in abandonment. It brings discernment and carries self-trust. It understands that we don’t need to disappear to be loved.

As presence deepens, clarity sharpens. Patterns that once felt normal begin to reveal their cost. Dynamics that quietly demand self-betrayal become more visible. Boundaries shift from feeling like walls to becoming declarations of dignity—and dignity is one of love’s most essential conditions.

This unfolding is not a dramatic reinvention. It’s a quiet reorientation—a daily return to the truth of who we are. It’s shaped by small, steady acts—such as speaking truth gently, letting grief move through, resting without guilt, expressing creativity, holding the line when it matters, noticing a pattern and saying—not this time.

The song Do You See Me? lives inside this practice. It’s a promise to look inward with tenderness and truth, and to set boundaries that protect the self I’m learning to honor—even when looking away would be easier.

As Valentine’s Day nears and love is on the mind, I don’t offer a prescription—only an invitation to remember that love does not live only in romance, but in how we greet ourselves each morning. Love lives in how we speak to ourselves when we fall short. It lives in how we let ourselves grow without punishing who we’ve been, and in how we stay present with our own unfolding. 💘

If you feel that subtle ache to know and to embody your whole self more deeply, please hear this not as correction, but as recognition. You’re not asking for too much. You’re ready to live more fully in relationship with yourself, and you deserve the love.

Perhaps the most important question is not whether anyone else sees you—but whether you are willing to see yourself honestly, wholly, and without apology.

We are not here to earn love. We are here to live as love—and that living begins by truly seeing ourselves first. ✨🙏✨


🦋 I’ve recently teamed up with some new friends to help organize a Substack together called Women’s Perspective. I hope you’ll join us for our next Women’s Perspective live on Substack, Saturday, February 7th at 11am CST/12pm EST. Our team members include: Harriet at WP, Emma Steel, Anne J Sharp, Unknown sender (Patricia), and me—Michelle Ried.

I’ll host next week’s live, where we’ll explore Various Aspects of Love.

Keep an eye out for my upcoming post, Feb 2nd: Michelle’s Library.✨💖✨



✨ Title: Do You See Me? ✨
By: Michelle Ried

Lyrics:

[Verse 1]
Do you truly see me, deep?
Have you ever really looked at me?
Peeked into my soul’s window
when I’m open wide?
What appears before you?
My heart’s reaching for you—
Yet you’re sitting still
on my windowsill.

[Pre-Chorus]
You talk but never ask me why.
Do you see my fire burning inside?
Tell me now, you can’t hide.
No, you can’t hide…ohhh…. 

[Chorus]
Do you care… that I am here?
Can you feel my flow?
I’m not shallow, I don’t want much.
Only want the gaze of your soul’s touch.

Still outside, you remain,
playing ego’s silly games.
Just look inside, I’m here to see.
Open up, open your eyes…
Tell me now, what do you find?
Do you see me?

[Verse 2]
Am I only a hand to feed your need?
Taking what you want, only receive.
Doesn’t feel like love, when it hurts me.

[Pre-Chorus]
You smile, and your silence burns.
I speak, and still you haven't heard.
Tell me now, what do you see?
Do you see me? Ohh…

[Chorus]

[Bridge]
In the stillness, I hear me.
Not what you want me to be.
When I fall, it won't be with
someone who can’t see me.
When I rise, it’s in my truth.
I have a light that burns too.
Do you… ooohh.. do you see my truth?

[Chorus]

[Outro]
Do you really?
Do you see me… 
Do you see me?

Threads of the Tapestry is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Leave a comment

Share

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar

Ready for more?